Available online Jul 11, 2018.
[ Review ] Volume 26, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 231-234
OBJECTIVES: To determine and compare the rate of success of two methods of passing urethral catheter following TURP using silicone Foley catheter: passing the urethral catheter with introducer into an empty bladder and passing the catheter without introducer into bladder filled with normal saline.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study carried out between October, 2013 and November, 2016 on 64 patients. Patients who had TURP for BPH where divided into 2 groups based on method of passing urethral catheter after the procedure: Group A: passing silicone urethral catheter with introducer into an empty bladder after TURP . Group B: passing silicone urethral catheter without introducer with bladder filled with normal saline. The outcomes of comparing the groups were computed using appropriate statistical tools.
RESULTS: Catheter was passed at single attempt for 15 patients in group A and 14 patients in group B. Successful passage of the catheter was achieved at 2 attempts for 7 patients in group A and 13 patients in group B. Whereas success was achieved at 3 attempts for 10 patients in group A and 5 patients in group B. On comparing the success 2 of attempts to pass the catheter in each group, x = 0.721, p = 0.396. Fisher exact test also did not reveal any significance, p = 0.286.
CONCLUSION: Passing silicone Foley urethral catheter into a bladder filled with normal saline after TURP is as effective as passing the catheter with the aid of introducer and guarantees no further injury to the urethra.
Subscribe to have full access to PDF format of all articles and get print copy of Nigerian Medical Journal.
Volume 26 | Issue 3
Page Nos. 231-234
Online since Oct 9, 2017